• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Cyberlaw clinic logo

Cyberlaw Clinic

Pro bono legal services to clients at the intersection of technology and social justice

  • TEAM
  • PRACTICE
  • RESOURCES
  • CONTACT
  • BLOG
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Ninth Circuit Hears Oral Argument in NSL Gag Order Case

Clinic Staff · October 9, 2014 ·

15481641875_0a98c72763_k copyThe Electronic Frontier Foundation‘s Deputy General Counsel (and Berkman Center Affiliate) Kurt Opsahl argued before a Ninth Circuit panel this week in a case — In re: National Security Letter, Under Seal v. Holder (Sealed), 13-15957 & 13-16731 (consolidated), 13-16732 — that challenges the constitutionality of gag orders embodied in National Security Letters.  The Ninth Circuit has posted audio of the arguments before Judges Ikuta, Smith, and Murguia.  

Douglas Letter of the US Department of Justice argued on behalf of the federal government, asserting that NSLs are useful tools in counter-terrorism and counter-espionage efforts.  Opsahl argued that restrictions on ISPs’ ability to discuss those Letters improperly limited their ability to contribute to an important public debate.

Photograph of Kurt Opsahl by Michael Lissner (CC-BY 2.0)

First Amendment, National Security

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcome. Content is for informational purposes and is not legal advice. Use of the site is not an invitation to enter into and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not convey information you regard as confidential unless a formal attorney-client relationship is established. Information received prior to establishment of such relationship will not be confidential.

Accessibility | Digital Accessibility

Cyberlaw Clinic

Copyright © 2025 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in